Home page  
Home   Your Room   Login   Contact   Feedback   Site Map   Search:  
Discover this product  
About Us
Overview
Getting here
Committees
Products
Forecasts
Order Data
Order Software
Services
Computing
Archive
PrepIFS
Research
Modelling
Reanalysis
Seasonal
Publications
Newsletters
Manuals
Library
News&Events
Calendar
Employment
Open Tenders
   
Home > Research > Ifsdocs > OBSERVATIONS >  
   

IFS documentation Front Page


Table of contents
Chapter 1. Non-IFS observation processing (OBSPROC): General overview

Chapter 2. Observations: Types, variables and error statistics

Chapter 3. CMA creation (MAKEMA)

Chapter 4. The FEEBACK task

Chapter 5. The TOOLS task

Chapter 6. Central-memory array (CMA) structure/format

Chapter 7. BUFR feedback data structure/format

Chapter 8. SIMULATED-observations data structure/format

Chapter 9. NAMELISTS

Chapter 10. Processing of scatterometer data

REFERENCES
 
  Next Section
Previous Section


10.4 Bias corrections




Two separate bias corrections are included in ERS1IF to improve the accuracy of the winds retrieved with CMOD4.


A bias correction is first performed before the wind retrieval, by substracting constant bias estimates from the raw backscatter measurements as a function of their antenna and node numbers. These bias estimates, derived from a routine comparison between the s measured by the scatterometer and the s simulated by CMOD4 from the first-guess winds of the ECMWF model, are supposed to account both for the variations that may occur in the instrumental calibration in time and for the residual defaults affecting the fit of the transfer function in the backscatter space.


A wind-speed bias correction is then added following the wind retrieval, in the form of a cubic spline function applied to the retrieved wind speeds that is dependent on the measurement node number. The purpose is now to match the scatterometer and model wind speeds over the whole wind-speed range (especially at high winds where CMOD4 tends to be biased low) so as to avoid introducing any speed-up or slow-down tendency in the assimilation process. Like the bias correction, this wind-speed-dependent bias correction relies on a direct comparison between scatterometer and model data, in which the wind speeds retrieved with the bias correction are fitted as a function of those deduced from the model first guess according to a Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) procedure. However, conventional observations from ships and buoys are also taken into account, to first assess the respective errors of both systems through a triple-collocation analysis. Furthermore, no time variations are considered here, since these are assumed to be already described by the bias term.


The and wind-speed bias corrections are defined by two dedicated files read in the initialization subroutine INIERSCA, and containing appropriate coefficients both for ERS-1 and ERS-2. The bias file is normally updated on a monthly basis, the bias applied over a given month being computed from the data from the month before, whilst the wind-speed-bias file is kept constant as a rule. More information about these bias corrections and their derivation can be found in Le Meur et al. (1997).


It should be noted that the corrections made are not kept explicitly in the scatterometer CMA reports, where the main outputs are limited to the retrieved wind components as well as to the distances to the cone and the associated quality-control flags. Moreover, the original measurements are also stored, together with the ESA-retrieved wind speeds and directions, to allow subsequent data monitoring from the analysis-feedback file.





Next Section
Previous Section



 

Top of page 18.04.2002
 
   Page Details         © ECMWF
shim shim shim