Table of contents
Chapter 1. Overview
Chapter 2. Radiation
Chapter 3. Turbulent diffusion and interactions
with the surface
Chapter 4. Subgrid-scale orographic drag
Chapter 5. Convection
Chapter 6. Clouds and large-scale precipitation
Chapter 7. Land suface parametrization
Chapter 8. Methane oxidation
Chapter 9. Climatological data
REFERENCES
|
|
Next
Section
Previous Section
The rate of atmospheric heating by absorption and scattering of shortwave
radiation is
where is the net total shortwave flux (the subscript SW will be omitted
in the remainder of this section).
is the diffuse radiance at wavenumber , in a direction
given by the azimuth angle, , and the zenith
angle, , with . In (2.20),
we assume a plane parallel atmosphere, and the vertical coordinate is the
optical depth , a convenient variable when the energy source is outside
the medium
is the extinction coefficient, equal to the sum of the scattering
coefficient of the aerosol (or cloud particle absorption
coefficient ) and the purely molecular absorption
coefficient . The diffuse radiance is governed by the radiation transfer equation
is the incident solar irradiance in the direction , is the single scattering albedo ( ) and is the scattering phase function which defines the probability that
radiation coming from direction ( ) is scattered
in direction ( ). The shortwave part of the scheme, originally
developed by Fouquart and Bonnel (1980) solves
the radiation transfer equation and integrates the fluxes over the whole
shortwave spectrum between 0.2 and 4 . Upward and downward fluxes are obtained from the reflectance
and transmittances of the layers, and the photon-path-distribution method
allows to separate the parametrization of the scattering processes from
that of the molecular absorption.
Solar radiation is attenuated by absorbing gases, mainly water vapour, uniformly
mixed gases (oxygen, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide) and ozone,
and scattered by molecules (Rayleigh scattering), aerosols and cloud particles.
Since scattering and molecular absorption occur simultaneously, the exact
amount of absorber along the photon path length is unknown, and band models
of the transmission function cannot be used directly as in longwave radiation
transfer (see Section 2.2).
The approach of the photon path distribution method is to calculate the
probability that a photon
contributing to the flux in the conservative
case (i.e., no absorption, , ) has encountered an absorber amount between and .With this distribution, the radiative flux at wavenumber is related to by
and the flux averaged over the spectral interval can then be
calculated with the help of any band model of the transmission function
To find the distribution function , the scattering problem is solved first,
by any method, for a set of arbitrarily fixed absorption coefficients , thus giving a set of simulated fluxes . An inverse Laplace transform is then performed on (2.23)
(Fouquart, 1974). The main advantage
of the method is that the actual distribution is smooth enough
that (2.23) gives accurate results
even if itself is not
known accurately. In fact, need not be
calculated explicitly as the spectrally integrated fluxes are
where and .
The atmospheric absorption in the water vapour bands is generally strong,
and the scheme determines an effective absorber amount between and derived from
where is an absorption coefficient chosen to approximate the spectrally
averaged transmission of the clear sky atmosphere
where is the total amount of absorber in a vertical column and . Once the effective absorber amounts of and uniformly mixed gases are found, the transmission functions are
computed using Pade approximants
Absorption by ozone is also taken into account, but since ozone is located
at low pressure levels for which molecular scattering is small and Mie scattering
is negligible, interactions between scattering processes and ozone absorption
are neglected. Transmission through ozone is computed using (2.24) where
the amount
of ozone is
is the diffusivity factor (see Section 2.2), and is the magnification
factor (Rodgers, 1967) used instead of to account for the sphericity of the atmosphere at very small
solar elevations
To perform the spectral integration, it is convenient to discretize the
solar spectral interval into subintervals in which the surface reflectance
can be considered as constant. Since the main cause of the important spectral
variation of the surface albedo is the sharp increase in the reflectivity
of the vegetation in the near infrared, and since water vapour does not
absorb below 0.68 , the shortwave scheme considers two spectral intervals, one for
the visible (0.2-0.68 ), one for
the near infrared (0.68-4.0 ) parts of
the solar spectrum. This cut-off at 0.68 also makes
the scheme more computationally efficient, in as much as the interactions
between gaseous absorption (by water vapour and uniformly mixed gases) and
scattering processes are accounted for only in the near-infrared interval.
Considering an atmosphere where a fraction (as seen from
the surface or the top of the atmosphere) is covered by clouds (the fraction
depends on which cloud-overlap assumption is
assumed for the calculations), the final fluxes are given as a weighted
average of the fluxes in the clear sky and in the cloudy fractions of the
column
where the subscripts ` ' and ` ' refer to
the clear-sky and cloudy fractions of the layer, respectively. In contrast
to the scheme of Geleyn and Hollingsworth (1979),
the fluxes are not obtained through the solution of a system of linear equations
in a matrix form. Rather, assuming an atmosphere divided into homogeneous
layers, the upward and downward fluxes at a given layer interface are given by
where and are the reflectance at the top and the transmittance
at the bottom of the th layer. Computations
of 's start at the surface and work upward, whereas
those of 's start at the top of the atmosphere and work
downward. and account for
the presence of cloud in the layer
where is the cloud fractional coverage of the layer within the cloudy
fraction of the column.
and are the reflectance at the top and transmittance
at the bottom of the cloudy fraction of the layer calculated with the Delta-Eddington
approximation. Given , , and , the optical thicknesses for the cloud, the aerosol
and the molecular absorption of the gases, respectively, and ( ), and and the cloud and aerosol asymmetry factors, and are calculated as functions of the total optical thickness of the
layer
of the total single scattering albedo
of the total asymmetry factor
of the reflectance of the underlying medium (surface or layers below
the th interface), and of the cosine of an effective
solar zenith angle which accounts for the decrease of the
direct solar beam and the corresponding increase of the diffuse part of
the downward radiation by the upper scattering layers
with the effective total cloudiness over level
and
, and are the optical thickness, single scattering
albedo and asymmetry factor of the cloud in the th layer, and is the diffusivity
factor. The scheme follows the Eddington approximation first proposed by
Shettle and Weinman (1970), then
modified by Joseph et al. (1976) to account more
accurately for the large fraction of radiation directly transmitted in the
forward scattering peak in case of highly asymmetric phase functions. Eddington's
approximation assumes that, in a scattering medium of optical thickness
, of single
scattering albedo , and of asymmetry factor , the radiance entering (2.17) can be written as
In that case, when the phase function is expanded as a series of associated
Legendre functions, all terms of order greater than one vanish when (2.20)
is integrated over and . The phase function is therefore given
by
where is the angle between incident and scattered radiances. The
integral in (2.20) thus becomes
where
is the asymmetry factor.
Using (2.38) in (2.20) after integrating over and dividing by , we get
We obtain a pair of equations for and by integrating
(2.39) over
For the cloudy layer assumed non-conservative ( ), the solutions
to (2.39) and (2.40),
for , are
where
The two boundary conditions allow to solve the system for and ; the downward directed diffuse flux at the top of the atmosphere
is zero, i.e.,
which translates into
The upward directed flux at the bottom of the layer is equal to the product
of the downward directed diffuse and direct fluxes and the corresponding
diffuse and direct reflectance ( and , respectively) of the underlying medium
which translates into
In the Delta-Eddington approximation, the phase function is approximated
by a Dirac delta function forward-scatter peak and a two-term expansion
of the phase function
where is the fractional scattering into the forward peak and the asymmetry factor of the truncated phase function. As shown
by Joseph et al.
(1976), these parameters are
The solution of the Eddington's equations remains the same provided that
the total optical thickness, single scattering albedo and asymmetry factor
entering (2.39)-(2.43)
take their transformed values
Practically, the optical thickness, single scattering albedo, asymmetry
factor and solar zenith angle entering (2.39)-(2.42) are , , and defined in (2.33)
and (2.34).
In the clear-sky part of the atmosphere, the shortwave
scheme accounts for scattering and absorption by molecules and aerosols.
The following calculations are practically done twice, once for the clear-sky
fraction ( ) of the atmospheric
column with equal to , simply modified
for the effect of Rayleigh and aerosol scattering, the second time for the
clear-sky fraction of each individual layer within the fraction of the atmospheric column containing clouds, with
equal to .
As the optical thickness for both Rayleigh and aerosol scattering is small,
and , the reflectance at the top and transmittance
at the bottom of the th layer can
be calculated using respectively a first and a second-order expansion of
the analytical solutions of the two-stream equations similar to that of
Coakley and Chylek (1975). For
Rayleigh scattering, the optical thickness, single scattering albedo and
asymmetry factor are respectively , , and , so that
The optical thickness of an atmospheric layer is simply
where is the Rayleigh optical thickness of the whole atmosphere parametrized
as a function of the solar zenith angle (Deschamps
et al., 1983)
For aerosol scattering and absorption, the optical thickness, single scattering
albedo and asymmetry factor are respectively , , with and , so that
where is the backscattering factor.
Practically, and are computed using (2.49) and the combined effect of aerosol
and Rayleigh scattering comes from using modified parameters corresponding
to the addition of the two scatterers with provision for the highly asymmetric
aerosol phase function through Delta-approximation of the forward scattering
peak (as in (2.40)-(2.41))
As for their cloudy counterparts, and must account
for the multiple reflections due to the layers underneath
and is the reflectance of the underlying medium and is the diffusivity factor.
Since interactions between molecular absorption and Rayleigh and aerosol
scattering are negligible, the radiative fluxes in a clear-sky atmosphere
are simply those calculated from (2.27) and (2.45) attenuated by the gaseous transmissions
(2.25).
To deal properly with the multiple reflections between the surface and the
cloud layers, it should be necessary to separate the contribution of each
individual reflecting surface to the layer reflectance and transmittances
in as much as each such surface gives rise to a particular distribution
of absorber amount. In case of an atmosphere including N cloud layers, the
reflected light above the highest cloud consists of photons directly reflected
by the highest cloud without interaction with the underlying atmosphere,
and of photons that have passed through this cloud layer and undergone at
least one reflection on the underlying atmosphere. In fact,
(2.22) should be written
where and are the conservative fluxes and the distributions
of absorber amount corresponding to the different reflecting surfaces.
Fouquart and Bonnel
(1980) have shown that a very good approximation to this problem is obtained
by evaluating the reflectance and transmittance of each layer (using (2.39) and (2.45)) assuming successively a non-reflecting
underlying medium ( ), then a reflecting underlying medium
( ). First calculations provide the contribution to
reflectance and transmittance of those photons interacting only with the
layer into consideration, whereas the second ones give the contribution
of the photons with interactions also outside the layer itself.
From those two sets of layer reflectance and transmittances ( ) and ( ) respectively, effective absorber amounts to be
applied to computing the transmission functions for upward and downward
fluxes are then derived using (2.23) and starting from the surface and working
the formulas upward
where and are the layer reflectance and transmittance
corresponding to a conservative scattering medium.
Finally the upward and downward fluxes are obtained as
As seen in Sub-section 2.3.2 (a), the cloud radiative properties depend
on three different parameters: the optical thickness , the asymmetry factor , and the single
scattering albedo .
Presently the cloud optical properties are derived from Fouquart (1987) for the water clouds,
and Ebert and Curry
(1992) for the ice clouds
is related to the cloud liquid water amount by
where is the mean effective radius of the size distribution of the
cloud water droplets. Presently is parametrized
as a linear function of height from 10 m at the surface
to 45 m at the top of the atmosphere, in an empirical
attempt at dealing with the variation of water cloud type with height. Smaller
water droplets are observed in low-level stratiform clouds whereas larger
droplets are found in mid-level cumuliform water clouds.
In the two spectral intervals of the shortwave radiation scheme, is fixed to 0.865 and 0.910, respectively, and is given as a function of following
Fouquart (1987)
These cloud shortwave radiative parameters have been fitted to in situ measurements
of stratocumulus clouds (Bonnel et al., 1983).
For the optical properties of ice clouds, we have
where the coefficients have been derived from Ebert and Curry (1992) for the
two intervals of the shortwave radiation scheme, and is fixed at 40 m.
Next Section
Previous Section
|