Home page  
Home   Your Room   Login   Contact   Feedback   Site Map   Search:  
Discover this product  
About Us
Overview
Getting here
Committees
Products
Forecasts
Order Data
Order Software
Services
Computing
Archive
PrepIFS
Research
Modelling
Reanalysis
Seasonal
Publications
Newsletters
Manuals
Library
News&Events
Calendar
Employment
Open Tenders
   
Home > Research > Ifsdocs > ASSIMILATION >  
   

DATA ASSIMILATION

IFS documentation Front Page


Table of contents

CHAPTER 1 Incremental formulation of 3D/4D variational assimilation-an overview

CHAPTER 2 3D variational assimilation

CHAPTER 3 4D variational assimilation

CHAPTER 4 Background term

CHAPTER 5 Conventional observational constraints

CHAPTER 6 Satellite observational constraints

CHAPTER 7 Background, analysis and forecast errors

CHAPTER 8 Gravity-wave control

CHAPTER 9 Data partitioning (OBSORT)

CHAPTER 10 Observation screening

CHAPTER 11 Analysis of snow

CHAPTER 12 Land surface analysis

CHAPTER 13 SST and sea-ice analysis

CHAPTER 14 Reduced-rank Kalman filter

REFERENCES

 
  Next Section
Previous Section


6.1 Introduction




The processing within 3D/4D-Var of satellite data follows the general layout presented in Sections 2.4 and 2.5 of Chapter 2 `3D variational assimilation' . The same vertical interpolation routines as in Chapter 5 `Conventional observational constraints' are used whenever possible. The main difference in the organization is that the radiative transfer code, RTTOV-5 (Saunders and Matricardi 1998), currently requires the model profiles to be interpolated to 43 fixed pressure levels from 1013.25 hPa to 0.1 hPa on which the radiative transfer coefficients are determined.


The current operational configuration uses TOVS radiances (Andersson et al. 1994), SCAT ambiguous surface winds (Stoffelen and Anderson, 1997), SSM/I total column water vapour and wind speed (Gerard and Saunders, 1999; Phalippou, 1996; Phalippou and Gérard, 1996) and SATOB cloud motion winds of various types (Tomassini et al. 1997). Operators also exist for SATEM thicknesses and PWC (Kelly and Pailleux, 1988; Kelly et al. 1991), and radiances from geostationary satellites. Cloud motion winds (SATOBs) are used just like any other upper level wind observations (Chapter 5 `Conventional observational constraints' ) and will not be discussed any further.


At the introduction of 21r1 (May 1999) we move from the use of RTOVS cloud-cleared radiances to 1C, or `raw', radiances, which do not require the 1D-Var retrieval step.


Next Section
Previous Section



 

Top of page 20.03.2002
 
   Page Details         © ECMWF
shim shim shim