Home page  
Home   Your Room   Login   Contact   Feedback   Site Map   Search:  
Discover this product  
About Us
Overview
Getting here
Committees
Products
Forecasts
Order Data
Order Software
Services
Computing
Archive
PrepIFS
Research
Modelling
Reanalysis
Seasonal
Publications
Newsletters
Manuals
Library
News&Events
Calendar
Employment
Open Tenders
   
Home > Newsevents > Training > Rcourse_notes > PARAMETRIZATION > RADIATION_TRANSFER >  
   

Radiation Transfer
March 2000

By Jean-Jacques Morcrette

European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts, Shinfield Park, Reading Berkshire RG2 9AX, United Kingdom




 
  Training Course Notes Front Page >>
Table of contents >>
Next Section >>
Previous Section >>



4 . Radiation schemes in use at ECMWF


4.1 The operational longwave scheme (as of March 2000)

The longwave radiation is an upgrade from the original scheme defined by Morcrette et al. (1986), Morcrette (1990, 1991, 1993).

Assuming a non-scattering atmosphere in local thermodynamic equilibrium, is given by
 
(4.1)
where is the monochromatic radiance at wavenumber at level , propagating in a direction (the angle that this direction makes with the vertical), where and is the monochromatic transmission through a layer whose limits are at and seen under the same angle , with . The subscript `surf' refers to the earth's surface.

After separating the upward and downward components (indicated by superscripts + and -, respectively), and integrating by parts, we obtain the radiation transfer equation as it is actually estimated in the longwave part of the radiation code
 
(4.2)
where, taking benefit of the isotropic nature of the longwave radiation, the radiance of (5.3) has been replaced by the Planck function in units of flux, (here, and elsewhere, is assumed to always includes the factor). is the surface temperature, that of the air just above the surface, is the temperature at pressure-level , that at the top of the atmospheric model. The transmission is evaluated as the radiance transmission in a direction to the vertical such that is the diffusivity factor (Elsasser, 1942).

The integrals in (4.2) are evaluated numerically, after discretization over the vertical grid, considering the atmosphere as a pile of homogeneous layers. As the cooling rate is strongly dependent on local conditions of temperature and pressure, and energy is mainly exchanged with the layers adjacent to the level where fluxes are calculated, the contribution of the distant layers is simply computed using a trapezoidal rule integration, but the contribution of the adjacent layers is evaluated with a two-point Gaussian quadrature, thus at the level,
 
(4.3)
where is the pressure corresponding to the Gaussian root and is the Gaussian weight. and are the Planck function gradients calculated between two interfaces, and between mid-layer and interface, respectively.

The longwave spectrum is divided into six spectral regions.
1) 0 - 350 & 1450 - 1880
2) 500 - 800
3) 800 - 970 & 1110 - 1250
4) 970 - 1110
5) 350 - 500
6) 1250 - 1450 & 1880 - 2820
corresponding to the centres of the rotation and vibration-rotation bands of H2O, the 15 band of CO2, the atmospheric window, the 9.6 band of O3, the 25 "window" region, and the wings of the vibration-rotation band of H2O, respectively.

Integration of (4.2) over wavenumber within the spectral region gives the upward and downward fluxes as
 
(4.4)

 
(4.5)
The formulation accounts for the different temperature dependencies involved in atmospheric flux calculations, namely that on , the temperature at the level where fluxes are calculated, and that on , the temperature that governs the transmission through the temperature dependence of the intensity and half-widths of the lines absorbing in the concerned spectral region.

The band transmissivities are non-isothermal accounting for the temperature dependence that arises from the wavenumber integration of the product of the monochromatic absorption and the Planck function. Two normalized band transmissivities are used for each absorber in a given spectral region: the first one for calculating the first right-hand-side. term in (4.2), involving the boundaries; it corresponds to the weighted average of the transmission function by the Planck function
 
(4.6)
the second one for calculating the integral term in (4.2) is the weighted average of the transmission function by the derivative of the Planck function
 
(4.7)
where is the pressure weighted amount of absorber.

In the scheme, the actual dependence on is carried out explicitly in the Planck functions integrated over the spectral regions. Although normalized relative to or , the transmissivities still depend on , both through Wien's displacement of the maximum of the Planck function with temperature and through the temperature dependence of the absorption coefficients. For computational efficiency, the transmissivities have been developed into Pade approximants
 
(4.8)
where is an effective amount of absorber which incorporates the diffusivity factor , the weighting of the absorber amount by pressure , and the temperature dependence of the absorption coefficients.

The function takes the form
 
(4.9)
The temperature dependence due to Wien's law is incorporated although there is no explicit variation of the coefficients and with temperature. These coefficients have been computed for temperatures between 187.5 and 312.5 K with a 12.5 K step, and transmissivities corresponding to the reference temperature the closest to the pressure weighted temperature are actually used in the scheme.

The effect on absorption of the Doppler broadening of the lines (important only for pressure lower than 10 hPa) is included simply using the pressure correction method proposed by Fels (1979) and incorporated by Giorgetta and Morcrette (1995).

The incorporation of the effects of clouds on the longwave fluxes follows the treatment discussed by Washington and Williamson (1977). Whatever the state of the cloudiness of the atmosphere, the scheme starts by calculating the fluxes corresponding to a clear-sky atmosphere and stores the terms of the energy exchange between the different levels (the integrals in (5.4) Let and be the upward and downward clear-sky fluxes. For any cloud layer actually present in the atmosphere, the scheme then evaluates the fluxes assuming a unique overcast cloud of emissivity unity. Let and the upward and downward fluxes when such a cloud is present in the layer of the atmosphere. Downward fluxes above the cloud, and upward fluxes below the cloud, are assumed to be given by the clear-sky values
 
(4.10)
Upward fluxes above the cloud ( for ) and downward fluxes below it ( for ) can be expressed with expressions similar to (4.3) provided the boundary terms are now replaced by terms corresponding to possible temperature discontinuities between the cloud and the surrounding air
 
(4.11)
where is now the total Planck function (integrated over the whole longwave spectrum) at level , and and are the longwave fluxes at the upper and lower boundaries of the cloud. Terms under the integrals correspond to exchange of energy between layers in clear-sky atmosphere and have already been computed in the first step of the calculations. This step is repeated for all cloudy layers. The fluxes for the actual atmosphere (with semi-transparent, fractional and/or multi-layered clouds) are derived from a linear combination of the fluxes calculated in previous steps with some cloud overlap assumption in the case of clouds present in several layers. Let be the index of the layer containing the highest cloud, the fractional cloud cover in layer , with for the upward flux at the surface, and with and to have the right boundary condition for downward fluxes above the highest cloud.

The maximum-random overlap assumption is operationally used in the ECMWF model, and the cloudy upward and downward fluxes are obtained as
 
(4.12)
In case of semi-transparent clouds, the fractional cloudiness entering the calculations is an effective cloud cover equal to the product of the emissivity due to the condensed water and the gases in the layer by the horizontal coverage of the cloud layer, with the emissivity, , related to the condensed water amount by
 
(4.13)
where is the condensed water mass absorption coefficient (in ) following Smith and Shi (1992) for water clouds and Ebert and Curry (1992) for ice clouds.

4.2 The operational SW scheme

The rate of atmospheric heating by absorption and scattering of shortwave radiation is
 
(4.14)
where is the net total shortwave flux (the subscript SW will be omitted in the remainder of this section).
 
(4.15)
is the diffuse radiance at wavenumber , in a direction given by the azimuth angle, , and the zenith angle, , with . In (4.15), we assume a plane parallel atmosphere, and the vertical coordinate is the optical depth , a convenient variable when the energy source is outside the medium
 
(4.16)
is the extinction coefficient, equal to the sum of the scattering coefficient of the aerosol (or cloud particle absorption coefficient ) and the purely molecular absorption coefficient . The diffuse radiance is governed by the radiation transfer equation
 
(4.17)
is the incident solar irradiance in the direction , is the single scattering albedo ( ) and is the scattering phase function which defines the probability that radiation coming from direction ( ) is scattered in direction ( ). The shortwave part of the scheme, originally developed by Fouquart and Bonnel (1980) solves the radiation transfer equation and integrates the fluxes over the whole shortwave spectrum between 0.2 and 4 . Upward and downward fluxes are obtained from the reflectance and transmittances of the layers, and the photon-path-distribution method allows to separate the parametrization of the scattering processes from that of the molecular absorption.

Solar radiation is attenuated by absorbing gases, mainly water vapour, uniformly mixed gases (oxygen, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide) and ozone, and scattered by molecules (Rayleigh scattering), aerosols and cloud particles. Since scattering and molecular absorption occur simultaneously, the exact amount of absorber along the photon path length is unknown, and band models of the transmission function cannot be used directly as in longwave radiation transfer (see Subsection 4.1). The approach of the photon path distribution method is to calculate the probability that a photon contributing to the flux in the conservative case (i.e., no absorption, , ) has encountered an absorber amount between and .With this distribution, the radiative flux at wavenumber is related to by
 
(4.18)
and the flux averaged over the spectral interval can then be calculated with the help of any band model of the transmission function
 
(4.19)
To find the distribution function , the scattering problem is solved first, by any method, for a set of arbitrarily fixed absorption coefficients , thus giving a set of simulated fluxes . An inverse Laplace transform is then performed on (4.19) (Fouquart, 1974). The main advantage of the method is that the actual distribution is smooth enough that (4.19) gives accurate results even if itself is not known accurately. In fact, need not be calculated explicitly as the spectrally integrated fluxes are
 
where and .

The atmospheric absorption in the water vapour bands is generally strong, and the scheme determines an effective absorber amount between and derived from
 
(4.20)
where is an absorption coefficient chosen to approximate the spectrally averaged transmission of the clear sky atmosphere
 
(4.21)
where is the total amount of absorber in a vertical column and . Once the effective absorber amounts of and uniformly mixed gases are found, the transmission functions are computed using Pade approximants
 
(4.22)
Absorption by ozone is also taken into account, but since ozone is located at low pressure levels for which molecular scattering is small and Mie scattering is negligible, interactions between scattering processes and ozone absorption are neglected. Transmission through ozone is computed using (4.22) where the amount of ozone is
 
is the diffusivity factor (see Subsection 4.1), and is the magnification factor (Rodgers, 1967) used instead of to account for the sphericity of the atmosphere at very small solar elevations
 
(4.23)
To perform the spectral integration, it is convenient to discretize the solar spectral interval into subintervals in which the surface reflectance can be considered as constant. Since the main cause of the important spectral variation of the surface albedo is the sharp increase in the reflectivity of the vegetation in the near infrared, and since water vapour does not absorb below 0.68 , the shortwave scheme considers two spectral intervals, one for the visible (0.2-0.68 ), one for the near infrared (0.68-4.0 ) parts of the solar spectrum. This cut-off at 0.68 also makes the scheme more computationally efficient, in as much as the interactions between gaseous absorption (by water vapour and uniformly mixed gases) and scattering processes are accounted for only in the near-infrared interval.

4.2 (a) Vertical integration

Considering an atmosphere where a fraction (as seen from the surface or the top of the atmosphere) is covered by clouds (the fraction depends on which cloud-overlap assumption is assumed for the calculations), the final fluxes are given as a weighted average of the fluxes in the clear sky and in the cloudy fractions of the column
 
where the subscripts ` ' and ` ' refer to the clear-sky and cloudy fractions of the layer, respectively. In contrast to the scheme of Geleyn and Hollingsworth (1979), the fluxes are not obtained through the solution of a system of linear equations in a matrix form. Rather, assuming an atmosphere divided into homogeneous layers, the upward and downward fluxes at a given layer interface are given by
 
(4.24)
where and are the reflectance at the top and the transmittance at the bottom of the th layer. Computations of 's start at the surface and work upward, whereas those of 's start at the top of the atmosphere and work downward. and account for the presence of cloud in the layer
 
(4.25)
where is the cloud fractional coverage of the layer within the cloudy fraction of the column.

4.2 (b) Cloudy fraction of the layer

and are the reflectance at the top and transmittance at the bottom of the cloudy fraction of the layer calculated with the Delta-Eddington approximation. Given , , and , the optical thicknesses for the cloud, the aerosol and the molecular absorption of the gases, respectively, and ( ), and and the cloud and aerosol asymmetry factors, and are calculated as functions of the total optical thickness of the layer
 
(4.26)
of the total single scattering albedo
 
(4.27)
of the total asymmetry factor
 
(4.28)
of the reflectance of the underlying medium (surface or layers below the th interface), and of the cosine of an effective solar zenith angle which accounts for the decrease of the direct solar beam and the corresponding increase of the diffuse part of the downward radiation by the upper scattering layers
 
(4.29)
with the effective total cloudiness over level
 
(4.30)
and
 
(4.31)
, and are the optical thickness, single scattering albedo and asymmetry factor of the cloud in the th layer, and is the diffusivity factor. The scheme follows the Eddington approximation first proposed by Shettle and Weinman (1970), then modified by Joseph et al. (1976) to account more accurately for the large fraction of radiation directly transmitted in the forward scattering peak in case of highly asymmetric phase functions. Eddington's approximation assumes that, in a scattering medium of optical thickness , of single scattering albedo , and of asymmetry factor , the radiance entering (4.15) can be written as
 
(4.32)
In that case, when the phase function is expanded as a series of associated Legendre functions, all terms of order greater than one vanish when (4.15) is integrated over and . The phase function is therefore given by
 
where is the angle between incident and scattered radiances. The integral in (4.15) thus becomes
 
(4.33)
where
 
is the asymmetry factor.

Using (4.33) in (4.15) after integrating over and dividing by , we get
 
(4.34)
We obtain a pair of equations for and by integrating (4.34) over
 
(4.35)
For the cloudy layer assumed non-conservative ( ), the solutions to(4.35), for , are
 
(4.36)
where
 
The two boundary conditions allow to solve the system for and ; the downward directed diffuse flux at the top of the atmosphere is zero, i.e.,
 
which translates into
 
(4.37)


The upward directed flux at the bottom of the layer is equal to the product of the downward directed diffuse and direct fluxes and the corresponding diffuse and direct reflectance ( and , respectively) of the underlying medium
 
which translates into
 
(4.38)


In the Delta-Eddington approximation, the phase function is approximated by a Dirac delta function forward-scatter peak and a two-term expansion of the phase function
 
where is the fractional scattering into the forward peak and the asymmetry factor of the truncated phase function. As shown by Joseph et al. (1976), these parameters are
 
(4.39)
The solution of the Eddington's equations remains the same provided that the total optical thickness, single scattering albedo and asymmetry factor entering (4.36) to (4.38) take their transformed values
 
(4.40)


Practically, the optical thickness, single scattering albedo, asymmetry factor and solar zenith angle entering (4.36) to (4.38) are , , and defined in (4.39) and (4.40).

4.2 (c) Clear-sky fraction of the layers In the clear-sky part of the atmosphere, the shortwave scheme accounts for scattering and absorption by molecules and aerosols. The following calculations are practically done twice, once for the clear-sky fraction ( ) of the atmospheric column with equal to , simply modified for the effect of Rayleigh and aerosol scattering, the second time for the clear-sky fraction of each individual layer within the fraction of the atmospheric column containing clouds, with equal to .

As the optical thickness for both Rayleigh and aerosol scattering is small, and , the reflectance at the top and transmittance at the bottom of the th layer can be calculated using respectively a first and a second-order expansion of the analytical solutions of the two-stream equations similar to that of Coakley and Chylek (1975). For Rayleigh scattering, the optical thickness, single scattering albedo and asymmetry factor are respectively , , and , so that
 
(4.41)
The optical thickness of an atmospheric layer is simply
 
(4.42)
where is the Rayleigh optical thickness of the whole atmosphere parametrized as a function of the solar zenith angle (Deschamps et al., 1983)

For aerosol scattering and absorption, the optical thickness, single scattering albedo and asymmetry factor are respectively , , with and , so that
 
(4.43)

 
(4.44)
where is the backscattering factor.

Practically, and are computed using (4.41) and the combined effect of aerosol and Rayleigh scattering comes from using modified parameters corresponding to the addition of the two scatterers with provision for the highly asymmetric aerosol phase function through Delta-approximation of the forward scattering peak (as in (4.39) and (4.40))
 
(4.45)
As for their cloudy counterparts, and must account for the multiple reflections due to the layers underneath
 
(4.46)
and is the reflectance of the underlying medium and is the diffusivity factor.

Since interactions between molecular absorption and Rayleigh and aerosol scattering are negligible, the radiative fluxes in a clear-sky atmosphere are simply those calculated from (4.24) and (4.41) attenuated by the gaseous transmissions (4.22).

4.2 (d) Multiple reflections between layers

To deal properly with the multiple reflections between the surface and the cloud layers, it should be necessary to separate the contribution of each individual reflecting surface to the layer reflectance and transmittances in as much as each such surface gives rise to a particular distribution of absorber amount. In case of an atmosphere including cloud layers, the reflected light above the highest cloud consists of photons directly reflected by the highest cloud without interaction with the underlying atmosphere, and of photons that have passed through this cloud layer and undergone at least one reflection on the underlying atmosphere. In fact, (4.17) should be written
 
(4.47)
where and are the conservative fluxes and the distributions of absorber amount corresponding to the different reflecting surfaces.

Fouquart and Bonnel (1980) have shown that a very good approximation to this problem is obtained by evaluating the reflectance and transmittance of each layer (using (4.34) and (4.40)) assuming successively a non-reflecting underlying medium ( ), then a reflecting underlying medium ( ). First calculations provide the contribution to reflectance and transmittance of those photons interacting only with the layer into consideration, whereas the second ones give the contribution of the photons with interactions also outside the layer itself.

From those two sets of layer reflectance and transmittances ( ) and ( ) respectively, effective absorber amounts to be applied to computing the transmission functions for upward and downward fluxes are then derived using (4.18) and starting from the surface and working the formulas upward
 
(4.48)
where and are the layer reflectance and transmittance corresponding to a conservative scattering medium.

Finally the upward and downward fluxes are obtained as
 


4.2 (e) Cloud shortwave optical properties

As seen in (4.36), the cloud radiative properties depend on three different parameters: the optical thickness , the asymmetry factor , and the single scattering albedo .

Presently the cloud optical properties are derived from Fouquart (1987) for the water clouds, and Ebert and Curry (1992) for the ice clouds

is related to the cloud liquid water amount by
 
where is the mean effective radius of the size distribution of the cloud water droplets. Presently is parametrized as a linear function of height from 10 m at the surface to 45 m at the top of the atmosphere, in an empirical attempt at dealing with the variation of water cloud type with height. Smaller water droplets are observed in low-level stratiform clouds whereas larger droplets are found in mid-level cumuliform water clouds.

In the two spectral intervals of the shortwave radiation scheme, is fixed to 0.865 and 0.910, respectively, and is given as a function of following Fouquart (1987)
 
(4.49)
These cloud shortwave radiative parameters have been fitted to in situ measurements of stratocumulus clouds (Bonnel et al., 1983).

For the optical properties of ice clouds, we have
 
(4.50)


where the coefficients have been derived from Ebert and Curry (1992) for the two intervals of the shortwave radiation scheme, and is fixed at 40 m.

Training Course Notes Front Page >>
Table of contents >>
Next Section >>
Previous Section >>






 

Top of page 12.06.2002
 
   Page Details         © ECMWF
shim shim shim