Home page  
Home   Your Room   Login   Contact   Feedback   Site Map   Search:  
Discover this product  
About Us
Overview
Getting here
Committees
Products
Forecasts
Order Data
Order Software
Services
Computing
Archive
PrepIFS
Research
Modelling
Reanalysis
Seasonal
Publications
Newsletters
Manuals
Library
News&Events
Calendar
Employment
Open Tenders
   
Home > Newsevents > Training > Rcourse_notes > DATA_ASSIMILATION > GRAV-WAVE_CONTROL >  
   

The control of gravity waves in data assimilation
27 April 1999

By Adrian Simmons
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts




 
  Training Course Notes Front Page >>
Table of contents >>
Next Section >>
Previous Section >>



APPENDIX A . Definition of operators for the ECMWF vertical finite-difference scheme

Specification of the forms for the matrices and and the vectors and has been given by Simmons and Burridge(1981), although with a notation different to that used here. We present the general case of a reference temperature that varies with pressure, with values at the "full" levels of the model, for . We assume a hybrid vertical coordinate in which the pressure at the "half" levels, , is defined as a function of the surface pressure, , with and .

The forms are:

 
(A.1)


 
(A.2)


 
(A.3)


and

 
(A.4)


Here

 
(A.5)


and

 
(A.6)


All expressions involving a pressure are evaluated for the reference surface pressure .

If the reference temperature profile is isothermal, with , (A.2) reduces to

 
(A.7)


and noting that

 


(A.4) becomes simply

 
(A.8)


We illustrate results by comparing modes computed for the idealized temperature profile shown in Fig. 25 with modes computed for isothermal reference profiles with temperatures of 245K and 300K. The idealized profile is constructed to be linear in in regions representative of the troposphere and stratosphere. This distribution of temperature has a mean value of approximately 245K


Figure 25 . An idealized vertical profile of temperature.


Table 2 . Gravity-wave phase speeds for the first nine modes of a 50-level version of the ECMWF model for the reference temperature profile shown in Fig. 25 and for two uniform reference temperatures. The reference surface pressure is 1000hPa.
Mode number
Phase speed (ms-1)
for reference temperature profile shown in Fig. 25
Phase speed (ms-1)
for 245K reference temperature
Phase speed (ms-1)
for 300K reference temperature
1
316
313
347
2
249
237
262
3
180
175
194
4
131
131
145
5
100
102
112
6
78
82
90
7
64
67
75
8
54
57
63
9
47
49
54
Gravity-wave phase speeds for the first nine modes are presented in Table 2 and mode structures for the profile shown in Fig. 25 and for the 245K reference temperature are shown in Fig. 26 . The corresponding mode structures for the 300K reference temperature can be seen in the right-hand panel of Fig. 10 . The gravity-wave phase speeds computed for the mean temperature of 245K are quite similar (within about 5%) to those computed for the reference state with varying tropospheric and stratospheric temperatures. Mode structures are qualitatively similar, but evidently reflect the differences in static stability in the troposphere and stratosphere. Phase speeds for the 245K reference temperature are smaller than those for the 300K reference by a factor equal to the square root of the ratio of the temperatures, and mode structures are identical for the two isothermal reference states. This is because the uniform reference temperature appears only as a simple factor multiplying each element of the matrix defined by equation (28)


Figure 26 . Structures of the first nine vertical modes of the 50-level model for the reference temperature profile shown in Fig. 25 and for a uniform reference temperature of 245K. The reference surface pressure is 1000hPa.


Training Course Notes Front Page >>
Table of contents >>
Next Section >>
Previous Section >>







 

Top of page 07.06.2002
 
   Page Details         © ECMWF
shim shim shim