Home page  
Home   Your Room   Login   Contact   Feedback   Site Map   Search:  
Discover this product  
About Us
Overview
Getting here
Committees
Products
Forecasts
Order Data
Order Software
Services
Computing
Archive
PrepIFS
Research
Modelling
Reanalysis
Seasonal
Publications
Newsletters
Manuals
Library
News&Events
Calendar
Employment
Open Tenders
   
Home > Newsevents > Training > Rcourse_notes > DATA_ASSIMILATION > ASSIM_TECHNIQUES_4dVAR >  
   

Assimilation Techniques: 4dVar
April 2001

By Mike Fisher

European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts.



 
  Training Course Notes Front Page >>
Table of contents >>
Next Section >>
Previous Section >>



2 . Comparison between the ECMWF 3dVar and 4dVar systems


The ECMWF 4dVar system is, from the technical point of view, very similar to the 3dVar system. Both systems use the same unix scripts, and share much of the Fortran code. The same background error covariance matrix and observation operators are used, and most of the peripheral tasks such as fetching and archiving of fields and observations are the same for the two analysis systems.

The main differences between the ECMWF 3dVar and 4dVar analyses (apart from the obvious difference that 4dVar includes integrations of the tangent linear and adjoint models during the minimization) are as follows:
    In 4dVar we perform two incremental updates. The tangent linear and adjoint models used during the first update include only very simple parameterizations of physical processes (Buizza 1994). A more complete package of physical parameterizations (Mahfouf and Rabier, 2000) is included for the second update. However, the parameterizations are computationally expensive. To reduce computational expense, the second update carries out fewer iterations of minimization than the first.
    For historical reasons, 3dVar approximates the tangent linear observation operators using a finite difference:

 
(1)
whereas 4dVar uses the true tangent linear operators.
    In 3dVar, all observations for the 6-hour window centred on the analysis time are collected together and are compared with the high-resolution trajectory at the nominal analysis time. The incremental cost function is:

 
(2)
In 4dVar, the observations are divided into 1-hour timeslots and compared with the trajectory at the appropriate time:

 
(3)


Training Course Notes Front Page >>
Table of contents >>
Next Section >>
Previous Section >>







 

Top of page 06.06.2002
 
   Page Details         © ECMWF
shim shim shim